by mckennascole » Sun Jan 19, 2014 6:12 pm
Lowlander wrote:Any implementation depends on standards more than on software developers. It is important that anything you do in one program with your files works with other programs as well.
If that was true there would be no technological developments. If you only comply with the "standards" you will have the "standard" product. Why not create a new "standard"? Why not make "mediamonkey" a benchmark software for classical music lovers? This is more than a player, it's a library management software, right? Why should you force all the medium to fit into the library's narrow set of rules?
Anyway, maybe you might consider increasing custom tag fields from 5 to 15+...that would be very useful for us, too...
Cheers.
[quote="Lowlander"]Any implementation depends on standards more than on software developers. It is important that anything you do in one program with your files works with other programs as well.[/quote]
If that was true there would be no technological developments. If you only comply with the "standards" you will have the "standard" product. Why not create a new "standard"? Why not make "mediamonkey" a benchmark software for classical music lovers? This is more than a player, it's a library management software, right? Why should you force all the medium to fit into the library's narrow set of rules?
Anyway, maybe you might consider increasing custom tag fields from 5 to 15+...that would be very useful for us, too... :)
Cheers.