Multiple Libraries? MM3

Post a reply

Smilies
:D :) :( :o :-? 8) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :roll: :wink:

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Multiple Libraries? MM3

Re: Multiple Libraries? MM3

by Activ » Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:55 am

Hey guys,

I found this searching for hard drive dock posts. Do you have any hard drive dock information? Not any particular model in mind...

~Activ

Re: Multiple Libraries? MM3

by Timo_Beil » Wed Jan 07, 2009 10:41 am

Hi Developers,
great an very universal solution for nearly every requirement related with different DBs, Users and localities.
:D :D :D :D
Thanks a lot!
-- Timo

Re: Multiple Libraries? MM3

by nynaevelan » Tue Jan 06, 2009 8:23 am

This is possible in the 3.1 Beta.

Nyn

Re: Multiple Libraries? MM3

by Guest2 » Tue Jan 06, 2009 6:50 am

It would be so easy.
If the developers let us select different Mediamonkey.ini with a key, that is called with MM.exe, we could configure all those local/central/home/... scenarios.

Re: Multiple Libraries? MM3

by habeas corpus » Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:42 am

Hi, I also would like multiple libraries. I have a hot swapable esata hard drive dock and I keep my collection on 3 separate drives (6 if you include backups). Now when I put a drive in the dock xp assigns a letter, when I put a different drive in xp assigns the same letter. If I change the letter of the drive, it reverts back when I unplug the hard drive and put the new one in or put the same one back in. So I have to use the same drive letter in xp for different drives, each one containing different music. If I had multiple libraries I could have library 1, 2, and 3; one for each drive. As it is now, I cannot separate the hard drive music files from each other which means redoing the library each time I load a hard drive which is not acceptable. I would gladly pay $20 for a MM with multiple library support. Anyway, I am currently using Catraxx which is more of a database program and kind of a complicated pain to use.

Oh, and if anyone has any work rounds, please let me know.

by John Ashman » Thu Jun 05, 2008 8:55 pm

Really? That's cool, except for the fact that I have an Apple!

by MoDementia » Thu Jun 05, 2008 8:19 pm

Already possible with a combination of filters and/or auto organise rules.

by John Ashman » Thu Jun 05, 2008 5:43 pm

We sell Sonos and as such, have to help people organize libraries and multiple library support is the one thing that has been a huge limitation with iTunes.

Without going back and looking at every suggestion, the main thing is to be able to define your own libraries and have them be 'virtual' as in a playlist or 'actual' in which new folders and locations are created. For instance, I had a separate drive for classical music, but it was tedious moving anything classical there sometimes. I also wanted to create actual folders for jazz, rock, etc. Or create more subgenres instead of generalized genres but then group them all together, such as putting 'latin rock', 'latin pop', traditional latin', 'brazilian jazz' etc all in a folder called "Latin Music". Or put music we know is good demo music in a "Demo Music Library" or a "Favorites Library".

The best similar thing we've found is in Apple's Mail program where you can make "if/then" rules. For instance "If genre contains 'jazz', move to library "Jazz Music". Or "If user is Lucy, move to library "Lucy's music". Or "If format = mp3, wma, aac, move [or copy] to library "iPod Folder". Then be able to look at sub libraries which would at least include folder/drive locations, but also the user created libraries.

In this way, as long as you have the rules set up, all the music would be moved or copied to the right folders and show up as separate sublibraries.

Re: Multiple Libraries? MM3

by kitkat » Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:44 am

MoDementia wrote:[For #2b]
A simple replacement is not an option as the path/device will be different. It would have to use the Song ID only.
Not quite true. For at least some people who've made this complaint, a simple replacement would be fine.

Why? Because it's just the comments, ratings, tag info, etc.--not the ability to ever listen to the song again--that we want available at the stroke of a search.

Hope at least that scenario can be coded sooner! :-D
kitkat wrote:most of the MP3s from my old MediaMonkey .mdb aren't on any computer anymore.

They're MP3s I've long since gotten rid of (or at least put away scattered on various data CDs in the back of my closet).

However, since I'm a DJ, it's important for me to have rating, BPM, album, artist, title, recording year, duration, etc. information even about MP3s I didn't like and didn't keep so I can avoid listening to them again if I find them on a new album in the future when I've already decided that I didn't like them the first time! :-D

by MoDementia » Fri May 30, 2008 6:53 pm

Some options

Load different libraries here and here

A couple of multiple user ratings options here

If you don't need to keep the FLAC - AAC/MP3 in sync as far as data goes then having them in the same libray and using 2 filters works quite well.

by Eli » Fri May 30, 2008 6:41 pm

This is a feature I would LOVE to see. I rip to FLAC, but use either AAC or MP3 for playing. I would love for MM to be able to handle this more gracefully.

Also, my wife and I both have our music on the same PC. It would be nice for us to be able to keep separate ratings. Even cooler if ratings from multiple users could be taken into account when creating on the fly playlists that everyone would like.

by MoDementia » Wed May 28, 2008 9:08 pm

I have written a script that should cover most of the requirements for Category 2b. called DEISync
Of course native support would be much nicer ;)

by MoDementia » Wed May 07, 2008 12:18 am

I have written a script that should cover most of the requirements for Category 3. called SyncTheSync
Of course native support would be much nicer :wink:

by MusicBringer » Wed Apr 09, 2008 4:53 am

You have set out an excellent summary here.
Good work, MoDementia.

by Morten » Wed Apr 09, 2008 4:15 am

Great that you have done this job. I'll read it later.

Top