Tagging Inconsistencies 4.0.1 (2014-02-27)

[Bex]

It means that MM's database contains info that the first Album Art of each and every track in the Album has not identical path. You can click on the subnodes and see the path.

PS There is a "Search this topic"-Search Box just above every top post in every thread. Very useful to find specific info in a large thread!

[Macarena]

I was wrong. But I've checked that searching the posts certainly gives you the correct answer Cheers, M

[cross]To my knowledge, if the First AA will be at your album directory in a 'Covers' subdirectory, that will be a different path. If it (the first AA) will be in the local album directory ('.', dot), then it's the same path. Cheers, M[/cross]

Can someone tell me what 'First Album Art Different Path' means? I could go through 48 pages but I'd rather not if someone wants to be nice to me.

p.s. there should be definitely more BBCode tags allowed

[Vyper]

Thanks guys.


And Bex, I never noticed that search box because on the skin I'm on it's in the lower left corner of the page. Thanks for the tip, that makes things so much easier!

[Mizery_Made]

p.s. there should be definitely more BBCode tags allowed

What were you trying to do? Can't say I've ever seen a "[cross]" BBCode.

[Macarena]

p.s. there should be definitely more BBCode tags allowed

What were you trying to do? Can't say I've ever seen a "[cross]" BBCode.

I've found the 'cross' tag when search 'cross bbcode' via Google in more than two references. Now I have found more:
[s]http://www.bbcode.org/examples/?id=4[/s] . I've never implemented a BBCode page, but it seems it's a playground with many options and it's on the admins what and how they allow tags. Cheers, M

[Pott]

Hey, I'm running into some issues with this script. Sometimes it starts-up normal but every other time I get an error message saying the script can't be started...and then it's simply not present in the file trees. Anyone else run into this?

Otherwise, thanks a lot for a very cool wee tool

[Pott]

Ah nevermind a quick search found what I needed once I'd gotten the cause of this... thanks! Everything works fine now.

[Emufan]

Hi,

as a new user from MM and TG I went through all the nodes in the PlugIn and all the pages here in this thread and have to say: GREAT! Thank you very much!

Is this still in development and enhancement? If yes, I woul like to propose some new nodes:

1. Track: Many of my files have the track number as well in the title. O.k. I can use Title starts with digit node, but more comfortable would be: Title contains title track (with or without leading zero).

2. Track: Many of my files have the artis number as well in the title. O.k. The current Title=Artist node is helpful, but: Title contains artist would be a step more helpfull.

3. Track: The node vs. track case inconsistencies in Album and in album and person node is very helpfull. Unfortunalety there isn't such MM standard tree for track titles, but do you think, that it could be possible to have a TI node for: track title exists several times, but with case inconsistencies?

4. Track: The Non-Letter and Accent inconsistencie nodes for persons are one of the greatest in the whol plugin. Do you think, this could be (like 3.) implemented for tracks as well, that means:
4a. Track title exists several times, but with Non Letter Inconsistencies?
4b. Track title exists several times, but with Accent Inconsistencies?

5. Beside Non-Letter and Accent inconsistencie for persons, which gave a kind of Fuzzy-Search already at the moment, do you think it could be possible to create a new node whith a Fuzzy matching like in the Duplicate Report Plug in, that means:
5a. Persons with Fuzzy inconsistencies?
5b. Tracks with Fuzzy inconsistencies?

Number 3 and 4 would be my Prio high wishes, followed by 1 and 2. 5 would only be the cherry on the cake.

@Bex: Thanks for a short opinion.

Best regards

[Bex]

Thanks Emufan!
Most, if not all, of your wishes are already implemented in or planned for next the version. I don't know when it's going to be released though, I struggle with some complex issues to get everything to work properly. In a couple of weeks maybe?

[Emufan]

Thanks Emufan!
Most, if not all, of your wishes are already implemented in or planned for next the version. I don't know when it's going to be released though, I struggle with some complex issues to get everything to work properly. In a couple of weeks maybe?

Thanks for the reply. Great news! So I'm looking forwart for the new version.

[nqstv]

Just want to say that I absolutely love this script Bex. It's, by far, my most used script and really helps to keep a 25k+ library in tip top shape. Much kudos to you and the work you are doing with this.

I should also say that I'm very excited for the update.

Oh, and you need to be admonished for contributing to my music library based OCD.

[Owyn]

I am working through Genres with few tracks at the moment. My to-do list says I have got as far as the "E"'s (for single track genres).
You never get it perfect, just pretty clean.

[Bex]

Just want to say that I absolutely love this script Bex. It's, by far, my most used script and really helps to keep a 25k+ library in tip top shape. Much kudos to you and the work you are doing with this.

I should also say that I'm very excited for the update.

Oh, and you need to be admonished for contributing to my music library based OCD.

Thanks nqstv!
Unfortunately will it take quite some time until we see the new update. I'm way to overloaded with other stuff at the moment. I'm aiming at a release date around Christmas.

[boomshanker]

Just wanted to say thanks. Your script has saved me a TONNE of time

[Bex]

Tank you, boomshanker!