by MMuser2011 » Sat Feb 09, 2019 9:18 am
My own experience (Februar 2019):
Using the MM.DB on a NAS is the slowest possible solution at all.
Whatever you use (SCSI, SATA, Filesystems as ext4, NTFS) you will never get the speed you would like to have.
My conclusion:
Never ever use your MM.DB on a NAS.
(Of course you can save your music or a copy of MM.DB on your NAS.)
But never use the MM.DB from a NAS to directly load/search/edit your tracks if speed is something that is important for you.
The fastest possible solution I have found so far:
Use the MM.DB on a internal SSD attached to the fastest possible port you can find (currently a M2 SSD, directly attached to a modern computer motherboard).
My own experience (Februar 2019):
Using the MM.DB on a NAS is the slowest possible solution at all.
Whatever you use (SCSI, SATA, Filesystems as ext4, NTFS) you will never get the speed you would like to have.
My conclusion:
Never ever use your MM.DB on a NAS.
(Of course you can save your music or a copy of MM.DB on your NAS.)
But never use the MM.DB from a NAS to directly load/search/edit your tracks if speed is something that is important for you.
The fastest possible solution I have found so far:
Use the MM.DB on a internal SSD attached to the fastest possible port you can find (currently a M2 SSD, directly attached to a modern computer motherboard).