:: Silk Icon Set for MM 2 + 3 (almost ) ::
Hey guys, I'm a MM newbie, so I don't quite know what to do next.
After much head scratching, testing and retesting, and reading online, it seems that the problem with the icons with black backgrounds might be that the icons ar being resized in the application. How can I find out if that's the case? Putting in a message in the bug forum seems a bit overkill, and I'm sure developers dont have icons as the highest priority.
So, what should i do? Just leave it be until MM3 is more advanced?
After much head scratching, testing and retesting, and reading online, it seems that the problem with the icons with black backgrounds might be that the icons ar being resized in the application. How can I find out if that's the case? Putting in a message in the bug forum seems a bit overkill, and I'm sure developers dont have icons as the highest priority.
So, what should i do? Just leave it be until MM3 is more advanced?
Sorry, I wrote bullshit.
I would contact a dev anyway...
I would contact a dev anyway...
Scripts in use: Genre Finder / Last.fm DJ / Magic Nodes / AutoRateAccurate / Last.FM Node
Skins in use: ZuneSkin SP / Eclipse SP
AutoRateAccurate 3.0.0 (New) - Rates all your songs in less than 5 seconds!
About me: icoaching - internet | marketing | design
-
- Posts: 185
- Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 4:26 pm
- Location: Gotland, Sweden
-
- Posts: 14163
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:57 am
- Location: (Texas)
- Contact:
if the icons are being treated as buttons in the skin then the black color is only being used to show clickable area of image.
and white is non clickable area of image.
this might be the reason some are having trouble showing?
that and there are some bugs in mm 3 beta skin right now.
and white is non clickable area of image.
this might be the reason some are having trouble showing?
that and there are some bugs in mm 3 beta skin right now.
roving cowboy / keith hall. My skins http://www.mediamonkey.com/forum/viewto ... =9&t=16724 for some help check on Monkey's helpful messages at http://www.mediamonkey.com/forum/viewto ... 4008#44008 MY SYSTEMS.1.Jukebox WinXp pro sp 3 version 3.5 gigabyte mb. 281 GHz amd athlon x2 240 built by me.) 2.WinXP pro sp3, vers 2.5.5 and vers 3.5 backup storage, shuttle 32a mb,734 MHz amd athlon put together by me.) 3.Dell demension, winxp pro sp3, mm3.5 spare jukebox.) 4.WinXp pro sp3, vers 3.5, dad's computer bought from computer store. )5. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G Android ) 6. amd a8-5600 apu 3.60ghz mm version 4 windows 7 pro bought from computer store.
-
- Posts: 2153
- Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:45 am
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
the first pixel (top left) is taken as the transparent color. These Icons which aren't transparent have all something painted on the tep left. So if you relfect the image so that there's nothing on the top left, it should be ok - it does for me!
BTW it's not enough to only clear the first top left pixel, but i down't know why.
BTW it's not enough to only clear the first top left pixel, but i down't know why.
Now when I was reading this thread and though about the icons in the navigation window I came to think about another thing.
It would be soo great if the user could choice to show or hide the "tree" on the left of the icons.
I really think these dotted lines and small + signs just looks plottery and pretty ugly. You understand that a title is a child of another by the left margin and if its collapsable there could be a small arrow or something. This would really make me and many other "design thinking people" glad:D
Happy for a answer devs:)
It would be soo great if the user could choice to show or hide the "tree" on the left of the icons.
I really think these dotted lines and small + signs just looks plottery and pretty ugly. You understand that a title is a child of another by the left margin and if its collapsable there could be a small arrow or something. This would really make me and many other "design thinking people" glad:D
Happy for a answer devs:)
-
- Posts: 2283
- Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:09 pm
- Location: Kansas City, Missouri, United States
-
- Posts: 2283
- Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:09 pm
- Location: Kansas City, Missouri, United States
-
- Posts: 2283
- Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:09 pm
- Location: Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Just noticed this a few moments ago:
When your at a point where editing the tag is not available, the button doesn't display with a background, though I have no clue on how buttons work so maybe it would still act like this even if the button image was busted. No clue, just thought I would point it out and see what's up.
When your at a point where editing the tag is not available, the button doesn't display with a background, though I have no clue on how buttons work so maybe it would still act like this even if the button image was busted. No clue, just thought I would point it out and see what's up.