MediaMonkey Feature/Bug Process

This forum is for reporting bugs in MediaMonkey for Windows 4. Note that version 4 is no longer actively maintained as it has been replaced by version 5.

Moderator: Gurus

rusty
Posts: 8415
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 3:39 am
Location: Montreal, Canada

MediaMonkey Feature/Bug Process

Post by rusty »

This summarizes how the MediaMonkey team uses the Forum and Mantis to help plan which features/bugfixes get implemented, and track whether the implementation is satisfactory or not.

Community Feedback:
Most community input comes via the Forums (Need Help, Bug Reports / Beta Forum) and Helpdesk. Forum moderators add forum feedback to Mantis, while MediaMonkey support personnel add relevant support issues to Mantis. When issues are added into Mantis, they include bidirectional links between the source and Mantis, along with status information.

For example:
1) Forum members raise an issue in the [Bug/Beta] Forums.
2) Other members/Moderators help resolve the issue, if possible.
- If Moderators confirm that it's a bug, it's entered it in Mantis with links between the forum and the bug, and tagged with Image and [#xxxx] (the bug number) in the forum.
- If the reported issue is determined to not be a bug or has been fixed, it's tagged with Image in the forum.
- If the reported issue is a feature request, it's tagged with: Image
- In addition, the following icons are used to denote status
  • Help needed: Image
  • Information: Image

Mantis - Product Version/Build and Severity:
When items are entered into Mantis, they are assigned a Severity (Feature, Trivial, Text, Tweak, Minor, Major, Crash, Block), to indicate whether the issue is a new Feature, or a bug--along with the perceived severity of a bug to users). Bugs also have attached Version/Build# information indicating what version of the software is affected.


Mantis - Target Version and Priority:
At the beginning of any release cycle, Product Managers and Developers create a bucket of Features and Bugs and assign it a particular Target version. Priority is determined based on a combination of severity and the effort/risk associated with a particular feature/bug, and may be re-evaluated as needs/priorities/resources change over the course of a release:
  • None: the issue has not yet been triaged. i.e. its priority for the release has not yet been evaluated.
  • Immediate: the issue should be resolved for the next build
  • Urgent: must-have for the release
  • High: nice to have for the release
  • Normal: nice to have, but unlikely due to risk
  • Low: no longer planned for this release

Mantis Workflow:
The Reporter enters an issue into Mantis. The issue Status is set to 'New' and Priority to 'None'.

The Product Manager/Dev Manager are notified of Untriaged issues (those with no Priority), and either:
  • Set Priority and Assign the bug to a Developer
  • Set Status to 'Resolved' as 'Duplicate' or 'Won't fix'
The developer reviews 'Assigned' bugs and either:
  • Sets status to 'Resolved' as 'Fixed' or 'Cannot Reproduce' as the case may be. Fixed bugs should have both a Fixed in Version value and a Build#.
  • Sets status to 'Feedback' to request clarification from the Reporter or the Manager
    • Reporters, Dev/Product Managers comment on issues with Status='Feedback', and set status to 'Feedback' or 'Resolved' or 'Assigned', as needed.
    • Developers comment on issues with Status='Feedback' and set status to 'Feedback' or 'Resolved', as needed.
Testers verify all issues that have been set to Status='Resolved', and either:
  • Change Status to 'Closed' with comment 'Verified in build xxxx', if the implementation meets users needs.
  • Change Status to 'Reopened':'Feedback', if the implementation does not meet users needs.
    In addition:
    - Testers tag the bug with 'todoc' if additional documentation is required
    - Testers update the bug description, as necessary so that it accurately reflects the bug
    - If the issue is resolved but there are associated issues that are somewhat independent of the original bug, then a new bug should be opened.
Notes:
- If an issue is a regression from a previous version, '(regression)' is appended to the Title.
- For any Status change except to Status='New', an issue should have an Owner. e.g. a bug should not be changed to Status='Feedback' without also setting who the feedback is required from. Note that Developers/Managers will typically overlook issues with Priority set to 'High' or lower, so if feedback is absolutely required in such cases, Priority can be raised with an indication in the comments that 'Priority is being raised from X to Y for discussion purposes only'.
- It's generally a good idea to keep discussions in Mantis, since it lets others see the rationale for decisions that are eventually made and because it makes it clear who 'owns' the issue at any point in time. In cases where an offline discussion is more productive, it's a good idea to summarize the discussion in mantis so that the rationale for a decision is clear.
- When deciding whether to create a new bug or enter information within an existing bug, use common sense and enter bugs in whatever manner will help developers most quickly resolve them. e.g. if two similar behaviors have different underlying causes, two bugs should be opened; but if they have a common underlying cause that will be resolved by a single fix, it's usually preferable to track them within a single bug. On the other hand if two completely distinct behaviors are caused by a common problem, a common parent bug can be used to track the 2 child bugs.
- Regarding the question of whether it's better to re-open a bug or create a new one; Bugs should only be 'Re-opened' if the original issue is not resolved--otherwise it's preferable to open a new issue, and set a Relationship to the previous issue. This ensures that the new issue will be Triaged correctly and that the new issue will be reflected correctly in the changelog.
- Note that the term 'bug' refers to both design and implementation deficiencies. In other words, if a specification yields an implementation that doesn't satisfy user needs, the issue should be 'Reopened' even though the requirements defined in the specification were met.
- The development environment also includes an automated test suite than is used independently of the blackbox testing described above.
MattTown
Posts: 252
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 5:09 pm
Location: Australia

Re: MediaMonkey Feature/Bug Process

Post by MattTown »

Dear Forum Moderators,

Could I humbly suggest that a rationalised version of these icon descriptions be pinned to the top of each forum.
 
rusty wrote: Mon Dec 08, 2008 11:32 pm - If Moderators confirm that it's a bug, it's entered it in Mantis with links between the forum and the bug, and tagged with Image and [#xxxx] (the bug number) in the forum.
- If the reported issue is determined to not be a bug or has been fixed, it's tagged with Image in the forum.
- If the reported issue is a feature request, it's tagged with: Image
- In addition, the following icons are used to denote status
  • Help needed: Image
  • Information: Image
I've seen these icons on the forum for as long as I have been on the forum, but have never known what they meant. And there isn't any pointer to a legend for them, so I was particularly glad to stumble across their descriptions in this obscure location. And by "obscure", I mean in a bug process thread in the Mediamonkey 4 forums. I understand how the info hasn't changed since MM4, but no current user is going to go looking there.

You might get some better informed feedback from forum participants (eg contributing to "help needed' posts) if more participants understand what the icons are trying to tell them.

Cheers
Matt
MM 2024.3003 (WEF 9 Mar 2024, Portable Mode), Gold lifetime license, user since 2009.
Currently 25K files. Library and music files are on a separate partition (E:\) on external USB drive.
Windows Surface Book (Original), i5, 8GB RAM, 250GB SSD.
Win10 Home 64 bit, update: 22H2 19045.3570
MMA 2.0.0.1103, Android 13 on Nokia XR20, music files on SD card.
Post Reply