Hi rrfpacker,
uwuerfel wrote:If it works I will explain you the reason (if you are interested).
rrfpacker wrote:So, looks like my problem may have been the items you mentioned. And, yes, I would like to know why it makes a difference.
OK, I'm happy to see that it works better now.
I'll try to explain the reasons.
uwuerfel wrote:rrfpacker wrote:
In that tab I have also set the "Show at Most" to 250 songs.
Please don't set this. just disable this setting for the moment.
The playlist works as input for Radio-DJ.
Only those songs you see in the playlist are used by Radio-DJ.
When you set it to 250 songs, the only thing Radio-DJ gets as input are just those 250 songs.
If you want to select just a subset, thats ok. Therefore I've chosen the playlists as input,
but you must have in mind that Radio-DJ will maybe behave strange, especially if the list is very short.
uwuerfel wrote:rrfpacker wrote:
Skip most recent is 25%
Please set this to 0 for the moment.
Radio-DJ reads the input playlist and sorts the songs according to their rating.
This setting further reduces the amount of available songs per rating.
From each rating 25% of the songs are removed.
That means that from those 250 songs you configured, only about 187 songs were used.
187 songs are too little for a randomizer like Radio-DJ to work properly.
I personally don't use this setting anymore.
I found out, that using the attribute "Last played x hours / days ago" from the auto playlist
does a much better job.
I have an auto playlist for each rating, where low ratings like 2 stars have a setting of about 1 week or more and higher ratings like 4 stars have a setting of a few hours. Then I merge those playlist in another playlist witch serves as my input playlist for Radio-DJ.
That way I can control very good how often a song gets repeated.
uwuerfel wrote:rrfpacker wrote:
and Favor Factor is 3
That's ok.
2 or 3 is a good setting.
If you hear complete albums from time to time I would recommend to set this to 2.
Be careful with higher settings.
This works internally with exponetial calculations.
My experience is, that it works best using 1 or 2.
CIAo, uwe..